The awful crash that claimed Oswaldo Paya’s life led immediately to
questions about its cause, fueled mainly by statements by Paya’s own family to
the effect that another car forced Paya’s car off the road (see BBC today,
and his daughter’s
statement yesterday).
The Cuban government has added nothing to the statement
it delivered Monday, which said that according to witness statements, the car “went
out of control and crashed into a tree.” [Update: On July 27 the Interior Ministry issued the results of its investigation.]
Here a roundup from other press reports:
AFP
reports, based on a “Spanish Embassy source” in Havana, that the Spanish
activist Angel Carromero, 27, was the driver of the car and remains under
questioning in Bayamo with a Spanish consular officer nearby. The source said that the investigative
process is “within the norm” given that Carromero was driving and two of his
passengers died. The Swedish activist
Aron Modig, also 27, was released and appears not to have given statements to
police “given that he remembers nothing” of the crash, according to the same
source.
A team of Reuters reporters filed this,
noting that Carromero could face criminal charges:
“We have serious doubts that it was an
accident,” Rosa Maria Paya, one of the activist’s three daughters, told
Reuters. “But we do not know for sure
what happened,” she added.
European diplomats said that while
Modig had returned to Havana and was free to fly home, Carromero, who was
driving the vehicle, remained in Granma as of Monday night, and faced possible
charges for reckless driving and involuntary manslaughter.
The diplomats, who asked not to be
identified, said it appeared the vehicle, traveling at well above the speed
limit, hit a large pot hole, veered off the road and hit a tree.
The diplomats said that so far there
was no evidence to back up the allegations by Paya’s daughter.
The diplomats said the Cuban government
had met with both country’s ambassadors and expressed a desire to work out the
incident.
Human rights monitor Elizardo Sanchez sent two activists to the scene. Based on their reports, Sanchez said that
there appears to be no other car involved and “the facts indicate a lamentable
accident” occurred. (See Diario
de Cuba and an article today from Europa
Press.) Sanchez also says that the
definitive word from the Carromero and Modig will only come when they are
outside Cuba.
Café Fuerte has photos
of the car taken from the Facebook page of a local Cuban reporter.
In a story carried this morning in El
Mundo, EFE reports that Carromero gave statements to the effect that he failed
to see a sign that orders drivers to reduce their speed, he lost control, and the
car went down an embankment. The story
is datelined Madrid and is sourced to “Spanish diplomatic sources.” El Mundo reports
separately from Havana, in a loosely phrased passage based on “non-official”
sources, that Carromero lost control on a tight curve.
Radio
Marti reports that Paya wrote his brother last June after a car accident in
Havana that left him with the sense that it was “very probable” that “they
tried to kill not just me but also my family.”
Update: More
on all this in today’s Herald,
including claims that Carromero and Modig phoned their offices on Sunday to say
that they were being pursued by another vehicle, and in Carromero’s case, to
say that their car was hit by a truck and driven off the road. In Chile, a Cuban opposition activist believes
that if Carromero admitted failure to heed a traffic sign then his statement is
the result of “coercion;” he goes on to explain that such a statement would
ensure that a criminal case would proceed and result in one to 10 years jail
time.
Update: The Herald
reports on Paya’s widow’s account of a call she got from the investigator, and
of messages from Carromero and Modig to colleagues in Europe where they said
their car was rammed by another. Penultimos
Dias has a quick transcript of her statement, and the audio.
the cuban government would have nothing to gain from harming Paya. the other side certainly has something to gain by creating the conspiracies now surrounding the unfortunate accident and death of this exceptional person. RIP
ReplyDeleteHey Phil,
ReplyDeleteit seems whenever the issue is US policy and Cuban Americans you are always quick with your opinion -- always mocking. But whenever its an issue that reflects badly on the Castro regime you always quote someone else's opinion. Why is that?
I can reply for Phil. He doesn't because he is a "fellow traveler" of the Castro regimen. Fellow travelers are people that from the academic fields have been supporting these kind of brutal regimes since the Soviet Union. Whenever I want to know the true stance of the Castro's I don't pay attention to Gramma's statements, but to Phil. He and another nice guy named Lopez-Levy (is Callegas) always are very well informed. From first hand, I guess......
ReplyDelete