Having a bad day? Rep. David Rivera’s is far worse.
The Herald
reports that defeated no-name Democratic primary candidate Justin Lamar
Sternad’s testimony is consistent with the public accounts of campaign vendors
– that Rep. Rivera funded and directed his campaign. Ana Alliegro, the GOP campaign consultant and
friend of Rivera who has gone missing, apparently referred to the Congressman
as “the gangster” when she talked to Sternad.
This story is incomparable, and it makes one
realize why Carl Hiassen left the Herald’s newsroom to write novels: the
envelopes of cash, the hotel-clerk candidate, Rivera’s Calle Ocho chutzpah, his
apparent confidence that federal law need not apply to his campaign, and Ms.
Alliegro’s disappearance, a mystery that looks like an act of iron loyalty to an
undeserving Rivera.
Could Granma be speechless? The paper is covering the Latin Grammys
rather than cranking up the screedster Jean-Guy Allard, who usually has to
think up words like “gangster” all by himself.
But beyond all that and beyond the legal
predicaments of Rep. Rivera and Ms. Alliegro, this saga is increasing the
likelihood that Democratic nominee Joe Garcia will win the November
election. Rivera’s finances and party
support are tanking. Cuban American
leaders are offering not one word of support.
As national Democrats sense a chance to pick up the seat, resources are
flowing to Garcia and will continue to do so.
Garcia’s election would mark a watershed in
the Cuba debate in Washington because he would break the unanimity of opinion
among Cuban Americans in the House and Senate.
He would not be outdone by any of the veterans in his criticism of Cuban
human rights practices, and Havana will surely call him a “terrorist” because
he worked at the Cuban American National Foundation. But Garcia would be the first to support
President Obama’s policies. He has a
common-sense view of Cuban American family visits, one in line with the way
most Americans approach the rest of the world: they are good for families, good
for Cubans in Cuba, and they just might contribute to positive change there. He has had the temerity to question USAID
programs, the amount of money that ends up in Miami, and their low impact in
Cuba.
Cuba would not be at the center of his
legislative priorities, as his district has more important concerns. But his impact would be significant. On the few occasions when Members of Congress
face Cuba questions, many rely on the Cuban Americans now among them, or on our
friend Mauricio who supports their campaigns, or on the bizarre Rep. Debbie
Wasserman Schultz. Having done so, you
can’t blame them for thinking that they have heard “how Cubans feel,” even
though it’s nary impossible to find a Cuban in Cuba who likes the idea of being
cut off from the outside world by any government’s travel restrictions, first
and foremost Havana’s.
With Garcia in the mix, Cuba policy will not
be transformed, but the debate will get healthier. For the first time the diversity in Cuban
American opinion will be reflected right there in the Florida delegation. By a Cuban American who, like most Americans,
sees openness as part of our identity, and as part of our strength.
1 comment:
Wow Phil! When I saw this story breaking over the past few days - I said to myself: "Can't wait to hear what Phil says about this three-ring circus." As usual, your own Cutzpah and sharp analysis of the potentially far-reaching and healthy impact that all this could have on the "Cuba issue" in Congress is right on the nose. Garcia would indeed be a fly in the Mauricio ointment and perhaps help give voice to a more nuanced and pragmatic approach. We'll see.
Post a Comment