Wednesday, December 12, 2012

The new cooperatives law

Here’s what I gather from the new law on private non-agricultural cooperatives in the Gaceta Oficial, which is actually two laws, a decree, and two ministerial resolutions, all of which were necessary because cooperatives were previously permitted only in the farm sector.

Just as pilot projects have been the first step in other reforms, this is a sort of pilot project involving the creation of about 200 cooperatives “with experimental character,” as the law says.  The law does not say how or when the experience of these 200 cooperatives will be evaluated, so we will have to stay tuned for that and for any refinements of the law and policy that result. 

The cooperatives will be self-governing businesses that are not connected to any state institution.  In that sense they differ from state enterprises, all of which have a connection to ministries and their enterprise groups and, in spite of efforts to engender autonomy, have in large measure remained subordinated to government entities.  The cooperatives will be on their own to sink or swim.

By self-governing, I refer to the law’s provisions where each member will have a vote, and cooperatives will create governing structures that correspond to their size.  In the section of the law that suggests governing structures, cooperatives of more than 60 members are contemplated.

The cooperatives will be free to do business with government entities, state enterprises, and private entities.  Except in markets where the state regulates prices, they will set their own.

There will be two kinds of cooperatives, I’ll call them start-ups (those that result from individuals who join together and apply to form a cooperative) and conversions (where the government decides that it wants to divest itself of an enterprise).  The law calls both of these “first-degree” cooperatives that form from the voluntary association of people.

There will also be “second-degree” cooperatives that are formed by two or more cooperatives.  I assume that this has to do mainly with agriculture, where farm cooperatives would join together and form a new cooperative that would handle transportation and sales of produce (see the Lineamientos, #29 and #180).

The application process for creation of any kind of cooperative starts at the local level, and the decision is made at the national level by the Council of Ministers.  If the pilot project is deemed successful, one wonders if this authority will be devolved to provincial or municipal authorities.

Who can form a start-up cooperative?  The law says that anyone age 18 or more who is a resident of Cuba and is capable of performing the proposed work can apply, and cooperatives must have at least three members.  Applicants must describe the economic activity in which they want to engage.  Unlike the law governing small entrepreneurship, the cooperatives law contains no exclusive list of permitted lines of work, and it does not bar university graduates from working in the activity for which they are trained.  If the government has a policy to favor certain types of cooperatives, it will only become apparent as applications are approved and denied in the pilot project phase and later.  The law itself contains no restriction.

In the case of conversions, the current employees of a state enterprise will have preference if they decide they want to form a cooperative and rent the premises from the state.  Leases will be up to ten years, renewable for an equal term.  When a state enterprise is converted to a cooperative, the cooperative will pay no rent for one year if it repairs the premises.

New cooperatives’ working capital will come from employees’ contributions, from bank loans, and from loans from a newly created Finance Ministry fund to support cooperatives.  Employees’ contributions will be reimbursed from the cooperatives’ earnings.  Cooperatives will pay taxes on their profits and will pay social security contributions for their members.

Cooperatives will decide how to distribute profits.  Distributions can be made when employee contributions have been paid back and there are no past due bank debts.  There is a requirement that a portion of profits be dedicated to a reserve fund for contingencies.

Cooperatives may hire temporary workers for terms of up to 90 days, and no more than 10 percent of work-days in any year may be performed by hired labor.  After 90 days, a cooperative must offer membership to a temporary worker or end the arrangement.

What does this all mean?

I think this is a major step, even though the full definition of the policy will only come with time as cooperatives are created and as the government moves beyond the experimental phase.

Certainly from a capitalist perspective, all we see are the restrictions – first and foremost in the requirement that these businesses organize as cooperatives. 

But from the perspective of the Cuba of five years ago, this new law was unimaginable. 

It opens the door to a much larger private sector, one involved in more substantial activities than the small entrepreneurs.  It is a second option for Cubans interested in private business activity, and a new option for friends and relatives abroad who would support them with capital.  There is nothing stopping five software designers from applying to form a business under this law; we’ll see if there is anything stopping the government from approving it.  If the sector prospers it can create efficiencies in agriculture, construction, transportation, and other sectors that will benefit Cuba’s economy and people.

And the government needs the cooperatives to prosper.  Without them, it cannot meet its own goals of cutting state payrolls and generating new private sector jobs. 

The pace will satisfy no one, the process will be influenced by officials with more orthodox views, and it will surely have positive and negative notes.  But there’s no denying that this law breaks new ground, with potentially large consequences.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Mr. Peters,

I agree with your comments. The law is promising.

It does not place limits on the type of economic activity that may be carried out by cooperatives and it offers a potential way out of the state sector for highly skilled personnel with university degrees that are not being used efficiently by the state sector.

It is also a way to provide employment out of the state sector and to reduce bloated and inneficient payrolls in the public sector.

But providing the same weight to each participant in the cooperatives instead of in accordance to the capital each provides puts a limit on the speed with which such coperatives would be financed.

Also the government does not have to ennunciate any explicit restrictions since these could be applied on an ad hoc basis through centralized national government approval of each new cooperative.

Furthermore, it is a pilot program which means that it is an experiment and that definitive regulations have not been formulated but will be the result of ongoing results, of trial and error decisions and of the relative weight of conservative and reform minded government burocracies supervising the results of the cooperatives that ahve been created.

So there are indefinitions about the project that make an analysis of it premature.

We should wait for it to function for some time before making a serious analysis.

It is a step forward taken because the totalitarian government as a last effort to survive because the leaders of the totalitarian government feel they have their backs to the wall and they have no other alternatives.

But I have my doubts whether such cooperatives would be allowed to succeed if they have positive results.

I suspect that at the first signs of success there would be severe efforts from th ruling hierarchy to restrict the growth of cooperatives or the whole effort would be so severely restricted and regulated that they would either be strangled on the craddle or placed under serious handicapps to try to sabotage their development.

Because we must not forget that in Cuba there is a circle of privileged bureaucrats living off the efforts of the rest of society whose parasitic existence depends on the continuation of centralized government controls.

This ruling group is well aware of the fact that its hold on power depends on the continuation of these centralized controls no matter how inefficient these controls are in practice or how dire is the economic situation of the country.

We must not forget that for these groups their own welfare trumps overcoming the country's crisis unless the political situation takes such a turn that it is evident to them that their own survival in power is at stake.

But, although Cuba is approaching that point, it is still not evident that this group considers that the situation is that critical because widespread public protests are not yet occurring.

So let's keep our fingers crossed and knock on wood hoping for some enlightened leadership and the continued success of the new experiment.

Buit do not hold your breath in anticipation, it will take some time for the results to become apparent and the project, even if successful, could be sabotaged or slowed down by the country's leaders.

It is the curse of totalitarian regimes for reforms to be held up or slowed down till the final crisis occurs and then to be attempted when it is too late for them to have any effect on the final result.

The elite's policies being counterproductive usually finally result in its downfall.

Let's see what happens in this case!

Cantaclaro

Anonymous said...

Great analysis in this piece, as well as very astute observations by your first"commentor" above. As for me, I see interesting parallels with Russia in the late 19th century, when the Tzar supposedly ended serfdom, but created the concept of the "Mir." In essence, while serfs were no longer shackled by the landowner directly, they were now shackled to their particular village group. In the end, serfs were as "enserfed" as ever. In Cuba, there is a clear reluctance to make room for individual intiative because it represents a diminution of governmental monopoly on power. We shall see if these new rules, in fact, stimulate production, just how far they'll let this initiative get.

Anonymous said...

as raul has commented many times, cuba must move into a more sustainable 21st century socialism. and they will do it without stopping, but without hurry.
these new coops are vitally important to continue the plan the government has. the fact people will want them to go faster, the fact there will be problems to be solved and mistakes made, that's all part of the process. it's very exciting to see what is happening, and what will be the effects in the next few years.
and now, lets hope the idiotic american siege against cuba can finally be exposed for what a waste it is, and to have it end.
keith bolender
cuba under siege (palgrave)

brianmack said...

Intelligent comments and I too agree
that the real test will come when
success rears its head. Sadly, if
the embargo didn't exist, all the pieces would fit together for some
real change. Mr. Gross was never needed if Cuban's had access to computers, cell phones and a direct
link with the USA's massive communication system. The changes that have been articulated would work and we'd probably see some scared older cronies on the run.

Anonymous said...

brianmack

i hope i haven't misunderstood your comment -- but please dont continue to promote the propaganda about Gross. His being in CUba was never about computers, internet, cell phones or communication. he was in Cuba as part of the continuing policy of siege against Cuba, to play another part in the intent to destroy the revolution, nothing more. he was bringing in BGANS and sim cards for a specific purpose, for anti-government activities. and he knew what he was doing and the consequences. so please don't make it out as anything else. there's enough of that propaganda among the media and political elites. and i assume the scared old cronies you refer are in miami, the ones who have benefited so much financially from the continuation of the blockade and are scared sh..tless that it might end, thus terminating their political influence and financial gain.

Anonymous said...

I disagree with the previous commentator.

Gross visits to Cuba was nothing but a provocation by teh Cuban Amerian right wing to paralyse progress towards negotiating a gradual end towards the embargo between the government of both countries.

A serious effort to create a mesh network in Havana would have invlved setting up the bgans in diplomatic missions and bringing them into the country via the diplomatic mail.

Also isntalling the BGANS and giving them the needed maintenance through technicians employed in the foreign embassies and consulates.

Instead of that Gross was sent like a lamb to the slaughter house on five different suicide missions to Cuba until he was eventually detected and arrested by the Cuban security services.

The result of all these intrigues was not only an incident that paralysed potential negotiations between both governments but the retardation of the implementation of a system that has the potential to break the barriers to the entrance of information to the island created by the Cuban government and to advance the realization of the the democratic transition in the island.

It also recklessly endangered members of the visiting American Jewish community in the island that unknowingly agreed to bring prohibited electronic equipment through the Cuban customs and members of the Cuban jewish community that helped Gross to set up BGANS, give them maintenance and learn to use them in Jewish NGO sites.

This was a project that was planned from its inception to fail and Gross was just a patsy manipulated into it by the payment of half a million bucks.

Do not be fooled the objective of this project was not to subvert teh Cuban gopvernment because otherwise it would have been planned in a more intelligent non childish way.

The real objective was to create obstacles that would retard the bettering of relations between both governments.

And this objective was very well planned and carried out brilliantly.

If the real objective was subversion those that planned the whole episode could have created a mesh network in Havana in a way that teh Cuban government could have done nothing to stop it.

They designed it to fail on purpose because this was not their objective.

Cantaclaro

to

Anonymous said...

I would have more confidence in the Raul Castro reforms when laws would be adopted that would establish general conditions that would have to be satisfied in order to establish new foreign investment or cooperatives.

Whenever the existing rules require that to create a new business you require central government approval you establish limitations on the speed with which new businesses will be created.

It is totlly unnecessary to have adhoc case by case analysis and approval.

It makes for a slower approval process, creates disincentives for potential investors and cooperative creators and provides a fertile environment for bribery and corruption.

Also by limiting the creation of new enterprises, central government authorizartion on an adhoc basis allows a way to limit free competition and permit the creation of monopolies and oligopolies that allow the members of the nomenklatura to enrich themselves and carry out a process of primitive accumulation that allows them to convert its members into a neobourgeoisie.

We must not forget that maintaining economic hegemony is the principal manner of supporting political supremacy and viceversa.

If the present totalitarian ruling circles want to hang on to power in the long run, they must find a way to continue to control the economy and the best way to do this is to keep control over the creation of new enterprises of any sort.

This of course means that the interest of the ruling circles are in the long run opposed to those of the country since the only way that they can keep power is by slowing down economic growth.

Ad hoc control means that all these apparent reforms are in the final analysis under the control of the ruling bureaucracy and that its effects are being consciously slowed down in order to allow the members of the ruling circles to be able to maintain control and to profit from them.

Thus a key demand from foreign investors and industrially developed governments should be that future economic reforms establish general regulations for private and cooperative enterprises that would allow them to be created automatically by simply meeting the established requisites without requiring specific government ad hoc authorization.

Without this step there is something incoplete and ficticious about the reforms that are being implemented tht will retard the positive effects that are expected from them.

CANTACLARO