Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Cuban media on the hunger strike
Cuban television broadcast a 15-minute video (here on YouTube) on the hunger strike conducted by Martha Beatriz Roque and fellow dissidents, alleging that she had a neighbor (who appears on camera) bring her food. Asked about this, Roque told AP that the question offended her and that “an avocado cannot bring down a hunger strike.” The video presents doctors who said her condition was good, recorded conversations with reporters and U.S. activists, and audio and video showing contact with U.S. diplomats. It also includes an apparent conversation with the wife of the prisoner for whom the hunger strike was undertaken, in which the wife says the prisoner had broken off his hunger strike and Roque reacted with some anger. Cuban media accounts are here in English and Spanish.
"The gangster"
Having a bad day? Rep. David Rivera’s is far worse.
The Herald
reports that defeated no-name Democratic primary candidate Justin Lamar
Sternad’s testimony is consistent with the public accounts of campaign vendors
– that Rep. Rivera funded and directed his campaign. Ana Alliegro, the GOP campaign consultant and
friend of Rivera who has gone missing, apparently referred to the Congressman
as “the gangster” when she talked to Sternad.
This story is incomparable, and it makes one
realize why Carl Hiassen left the Herald’s newsroom to write novels: the
envelopes of cash, the hotel-clerk candidate, Rivera’s Calle Ocho chutzpah, his
apparent confidence that federal law need not apply to his campaign, and Ms.
Alliegro’s disappearance, a mystery that looks like an act of iron loyalty to an
undeserving Rivera.
Could Granma be speechless? The paper is covering the Latin Grammys
rather than cranking up the screedster Jean-Guy Allard, who usually has to
think up words like “gangster” all by himself.
But beyond all that and beyond the legal
predicaments of Rep. Rivera and Ms. Alliegro, this saga is increasing the
likelihood that Democratic nominee Joe Garcia will win the November
election. Rivera’s finances and party
support are tanking. Cuban American
leaders are offering not one word of support.
As national Democrats sense a chance to pick up the seat, resources are
flowing to Garcia and will continue to do so.
Garcia’s election would mark a watershed in
the Cuba debate in Washington because he would break the unanimity of opinion
among Cuban Americans in the House and Senate.
He would not be outdone by any of the veterans in his criticism of Cuban
human rights practices, and Havana will surely call him a “terrorist” because
he worked at the Cuban American National Foundation. But Garcia would be the first to support
President Obama’s policies. He has a
common-sense view of Cuban American family visits, one in line with the way
most Americans approach the rest of the world: they are good for families, good
for Cubans in Cuba, and they just might contribute to positive change there. He has had the temerity to question USAID
programs, the amount of money that ends up in Miami, and their low impact in
Cuba.
Cuba would not be at the center of his
legislative priorities, as his district has more important concerns. But his impact would be significant. On the few occasions when Members of Congress
face Cuba questions, many rely on the Cuban Americans now among them, or on our
friend Mauricio who supports their campaigns, or on the bizarre Rep. Debbie
Wasserman Schultz. Having done so, you
can’t blame them for thinking that they have heard “how Cubans feel,” even
though it’s nary impossible to find a Cuban in Cuba who likes the idea of being
cut off from the outside world by any government’s travel restrictions, first
and foremost Havana’s.
With Garcia in the mix, Cuba policy will not
be transformed, but the debate will get healthier. For the first time the diversity in Cuban
American opinion will be reflected right there in the Florida delegation. By a Cuban American who, like most Americans,
sees openness as part of our identity, and as part of our strength.
Tuesday, September 25, 2012
The inimitable politics of Miami-Dade
The apparent scheme whereby Rep. David Rivera
and associates helped an unknown candidate in the Democratic primary came to
light in part because some of those involved – including direct mail vendors
who were paid with envelopes of cash – spoke on the record.
Now, with an FBI probe under way, some
information on the investigation itself is getting to the Miami Herald. This story affirms that the FBI has in its hands four envelopes in which cash
payments were allegedly delivered to a direct mail outfit. The cash paid for mailings for the campaign
of the no-name Democrat, Justin Lamar Sternad, who mainly attacked candidate
Joe Garcia, who is now the nominee. It
also reports that invoices for those mailings were originally directed to
Rivera.
And there’s this very colorful profile of the key figure, Republican political
consultant and Rivera friend Ana Alliegro, who apparently helped Sternad. Alliegro has gone incommunicado since failing
to appear for a September 6 FBI interview that her attorney had arranged in
lieu of a grand jury appearance. Her
grandfather was President of the Senate in Cuba during the Batista era, but the
rest is much more colorful.
For some time, Mitt Romney and national
Republicans have been keeping their distance from Rivera. Senator Rubio has not addressed the allegations about Rivera but stands by him as a loyal friend. And for now, Granma has steered clear of the
story, but that can’t last forever.
Odds and ends
·
New York Times: GOP vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan,
leaving his anti-embargo voting record behind, visited Versailles on Calle Ocho
and explained how his Cuban-American colleagues helped him see the light. And maybe they believe him.
·
Prensa Latina: Cuba’s justice ministry says it has handled
the paperwork for 45,000 real estate transfers through the end of August –
sales, swaps, and donations.
·
Venezuelan
journalist Nelson Bocaranda says that representatives of the Venezuelan
opposition candidate were received in Havana by President Raul Castro and Vice
President Machado Ventura to discuss “future Cuban cooperation.”
·
Along the Malecon publishes the National Endowment for
Democracy’s latest list of Cuba grants. And
USAID’s administrator told the Herald that he doesn’t see his Cuba program as “aid
for the opposition.”
·
In the New York Times Magazine, a long article about a trip to Cuba by an
American who married into a Cuban family.
·
The BBC’s
Fernando Ravsberg says that widespread Internet access in Cuba is inevitable,
whether provided by the government or by “its enemies.”
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
Odds and ends
·
Reuters: Cuban foreign ministry official Josefina Vidal says Cuba has proposed
talks with the United States about the Alan Gross case, but “up to this
moment we have not received a response.”
“Therefore,” she adds, “it is clear that it is not Cuba, but the United
States that is not showing interest in this case.” The State Department responded with a
statement that rejects the idea of talks with Cuba and instead demands a “humanitarian
gesture to release Mr. Gross.” Sorry,
Alan.
·
With the
release of prisoner Jorge Vasquez Chaviano, Martha Beatriz Roque and fellow
hunger strikers have ended their hunger strikes. Roque’s condition had grown precarious (AP). Tracey Eaton noted the demands of all the hunger strikers
and linked to his interview with Roque.
·
Here are
two Reuters stories on recently reported economic statistics in Cuba; on agricultural
production and employment. The data comes from the National Statistics
Office’s annual report, the 2011
edition of which is being released one chapter at a time.
·
BBC Mundo: As Cuba’s legislative elections approach, many are more attuned to
the potential impact of elections in Venezuela and the United States.
Labels:
economy,
elections,
human rights,
opposition,
reform,
usaid
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)