· What makes Cubans the chosen people of U.S. immigration
policy is not just that they have been admitted without a visa, but that they
also receive U.S. government benefits that are extended to no similarly
situated immigrants of any other nationality. These benefits are described in
this superb
series from the Sun Sentinel, based on reporting from Florida and Cuba. The
phenomenon of Cubans coming to the United States, qualifying for the benefits,
and returning to Cuba to live off the benefits has surely grown since Cuba’s
immigration laws changed and made back-and-forth travel much easier. By all
means blame the beneficiaries for taking advantage of U.S. programs, but
elected officials are abusing the taxpayer by legislating this gravy train in
the first place. President Obama’s action last week is an indirect solution,
but Congress would do well to make refugee benefits available to refugees only
– as Senator Rubio and Congressman Curbelo, to their credit, propose.
· Senator Rubio’s statement,
once you get past the obligatory shots at President Obama, actually supports
the action the President took last week. He says it’s important to be sure that
potential refugees and asylees have an opportunity to have their claims heard,
but he does not oppose the heart of Obama’s action, which is to return Cuban
migrants who arrive without a visa. He refers to “abuse” of the system, which
based on some of his past
statements means Cubans who arrive, acquire residency, then travel to Cuba
– just like immigrants from other countries who visit home, but in Rubio’s mind
it’s an abuse because Cubans are supposed to act like exiles, as if they are
refugees who fear returning to Cuba. In 2015, 1,527 Cubans
were admitted to the United States with refugee status. Senator Rubio does
oppose Obama’s action on the Cuban doctor program and sounds optimistic that
Trump will reverse it.
· If you’re wondering what the U.S.-Cuba
joint statement (pdf) means when it refers to returning Cubans who came through
the port of Mariel and others, it’s explained in the New York Times.
No comments:
Post a Comment