Hugo Chavez had a pretty good run, governing Venezuela since 1999, winning four elections, and having lots of time to put in place and to develop his brand of socialism.
He made quite a mark.
At a time when the hemisphere, acting through the OAS, had joined
together in a commitment to reject coups d’etat and similar usurpations of
democracy, he governed by winning elections and then eroding elements of
Venezuela’s democracy, never quite touching a tripwire that would bring an
international response. He benefited
from opposition parties that had had excluded Venezuela’s poor during their decades
in power, and that never found unity or balance in opposition.
Chavez cared about the poor and had an odd way of
showing it. He put social programs in
place – health, education, income assistance – and at the same time implemented
policies that have gone a long way toward wrecking the economy in which poor
Venezuelans and all others live. He
drove away foreign investment, eroded property rights, imposed foreign exchange
controls that distort the entire economy and lead to corruption, and created
food shortages. To the latter, his
government has responded for years with absurd charges that food producers are
hoarding and speculating, as if farmers and distributors go into business for
the purpose of keeping their products in warehouses.
All this, in an economy that is more than capable of
maintaining both a strong private sector and a large financial commitment to
fighting poverty. Venezuela’s oil wealth
gave him the wherewithal to set an example for both left and right, but Chavez’
ideology led elsewhere.
Fidel Castro once dreamed of armed revolution throughout
Latin America, where the Andes would become the continent’s Sierra
Maestra. Chavez surely delighted him,
along with the advent of like-minded leaders in Bolivia and Ecuador.
For Cuba, the risk in Chavez’ passing is that the
economic relationship with Venezuela may change or end, raising the cost of Cuba’s
energy supplies and damaging the entire economy. Chavez’ socialist party, having won the
presidency last October and 20 of 23 state governorships last December, has to
be counted as a favorite in Venezuela’s 30-day snap election scenario. If the socialists win, the Bolivarian project
would seem safe, including its international aspects. If the opposition wins, the relationship with
Cuba would likely be scaled back and new prices would be attached to the
doctors-for-oil swap that so benefits Cuba today.
The bottom line is that post-Chavez politics is new in
Venezuela, and that brings a note of uncertainty for Cuba, the last thing el comandante Chavez would have wanted
to leave behind. R.I.P.
6 comments:
In the final analysis the economic chaos Chavez left behind and possible oil price drops will make it impossible for the Venezuelan government to continue financing his populist policies and continue to subsidize to the same degree all the leftist regimes of Latin America.
Even if Chavez successors are willing to continue financing the rest of the Latin American left they will not have the werewithal to carry it out.
They will inevitably have to choose between continuing their internal populist policies or their subsidies to the Latin American left.
Considering their interest in their own political survival I have no doubt which of the two options they will favor.
This will pressure the Cuban government into trying to negotiate the end the quarrel with the US and have the embargo lifted in order to be able to join the global competitive economy and ensure their own survival.
But the full effects of all of this will not be felt immediately.
We will probably have to wait at least a year or two.
Cantaclaro
Raul needs to hurry up with his reforms, lest Cuba sink into another Special period.
Rare leader Did not bow to global powers..loved by his people and respected by all. I hope Venezuela can give birth to another good leader to its people.
what's the matter Phil? Didn't read the Washington Post today?
As usual, a very thoughtful, balanced, and clear-eyed analysis. Que en paz descanse. Y mucha suerte para los pueblos venezolanos y cubanos.
To the previous Anonymous Contributor,
Que tiene que ver la amnesia con la magnesia?
What did the Washington Post editorial asking for an international investigation into Paya's death have to do with Chavez's death?
What does this editorial have to do with Mr. Peter's statement on Chavez's death?
Is your comment serious?
It frankly does not make any sense to me!
Please clear this up!
Cantaclaro
Post a Comment